The Casinos Gaming Machines and Mandatory Conditions Regulations 2025: impact assessments RPC opinion green-rated
As the SI sets out, all games which meet the definition of an online slots game will be subject to a maximum stake per game cycle. “game cycle” means, for an online slots game, the period beginning with the initiation of a game by the individual and ending at the point at which all money staked during the game has been lost or all money won during the game has been delivered to or made available for collection by the individual as the case may be. (2) The condition is that, for an online slots game, the total amount which an individual may stake in relation to any game cycle may not exceed— We can also assess a licensee’s ongoing suitability to hold a relevant license, particularly if there is evidence of misconduct abroad and that does include in Northern Ireland. Added link to 2026 edition of the Gambling Commission’s Money laundering and terrorist financing risk assessment. Read our guidance for information on operator LCCP requirements, including how these can be implemented in practice.
However, even when accounting for device type (i.e. cabinet, in-fill or tablet), the responses suggest that Category C and D gaming machines generate less GGY than Category B machines. For example, one large arcade operator projected a 20% increase in the number of Category B gaming machines under Option 1, which corresponded to a projected medium increase in GGY. Industry responses suggested that the projected uplift in GGY under Options 1 and 3, and conversely, the decrease or no impact in GGY under Option 2, corresponds directly with the ability to site Category B gaming machines.
There was broad support amongst respondents for alignment, including from the Lotteries Council and the Chartered Institute of Fundraising. Little evidence was received to support the inconsistency between the minimum age of 18 to play the National Lottery and the minimum age of 16 for large society lotteries. We also received specific evidence on the vulnerabilities of the under 18 to 24 age group which are considered in Section 5.4 below. Some operators highlighted policies to limit access to VIP/HVC incentives for young adults, and reported that they set lower deposit limits and intervention triggers for those aged 18 to 24. We expect operators to continually review and improve their age verification procedures as new technologies or capabilities are developed, such as digital identity, which is discussed in section 1.2 above.
The financial regulation of gambling is set out mostly in the British Finance Acts and provides for various levels of duty upon different types of gambling. Not regarded as gambling where the element of chance is no more than de minimis. Free-to-enter draws and betting competitions may be exempt if they meet conditions for free draws or prize competitions.
- It will now take forward work to review the design and targeting of incentives such as free bets and bonuses to ensure there are clear rules and fair limits on re-wagering requirements and time limits so they do not encourage excessive or harmful gambling.
- Taking this approach will quickly introduce strengthened dispute resolution for customers to help them, where appropriate, receive redress should an operator be found to have treated them unfairly.
- Some industry submissions suggested those who demonstrate effective governance and procedural controls should pay lower fees, although a number of other submissions from industry were strongly against such a proposal.
- By contrast, industry responses argued that Option 2 would be highly restrictive for many operators and would overall provide less commercial flexibility than is currently available under the 80/20 ratio.
- From 31 October 2025 all gambling businesses must prompt their customers to set a financial limit before they make their first deposit and make it easy to review and alter this limit at any point after.
The transition between casino and the small sportsbook section was instantaneous. Sign-up took under three minutes including ID upload, and the funds hit my balance instantly via Apple Pay. UKGC licence number sits in the footer, GAMSTOP integration is active, and affordability checks kick in at the legally mandated thresholds. Every review is based on real-money testing, with sub-ratings for game variety, user interface and banking. We score payout speed, game variety, bonus fairness, mobile experience, customer support, security, and responsible gambling tools, and re-test monthly to keep rankings current.
We do not believe that a 10% increase is sufficient to future-proof licensing authority funding in line with the recovery of the land-based sector from the challenges of COVID-19 and rising energy prices in recent years. Increased fees will enable licensing authorities to undertake more enforcement and engagement activities with licensed premises. We believe that on balance an increase to casino not on gamestop the maximum cap on premises licence fees by 15% is proportionate. A low number of premises visits may also be indicative of the lack of funding received by licensing authorities to fully undertake duties, such as inspections, alongside other administrative and enforcement functions. However, premises visits are only one aspect of a licensing authorities regulatory work. A number of these responses acknowledged the financial pressures placed on licensing authorities, which was reflected by the substantial number of industry responses that advocated for a 10% increase.
We think that behavioural science provides valuable insights around how the design of platforms and processes can be improved to better empower consumers and reduce the risk of harm. The ICO stressed the importance of licensed operators upholding the information rights of data subjects. Gamblers commonly resort to self-exclusion as a way to close a gambling account, with evidence suggesting this as a motivating factor for 37% of self-exclusions. Stakeholders also had concerns that there is rarely a simple way to close an online gambling account without speaking to a customer service representative. There are no specific provisions relating to how information is presented on screen, but where a product carries an underlying risk of harm, it is in the best interests of the consumer that material information is as easy as possible to access and understand. Licensed operators should be transparent with customers, both at the start of the relationship and throughout, about how, when and why an account might be restricted, and ensure customers are aware of any restrictions prior to placing a bet.
The legislative changes allow for betting to be offered as an activity in converted casino premises. The changes allow casinos that were already operating when the Gambling Act 2005 (the Act) came into force, referred to as converted premises, to access new entitlements if certain conditions are met. These casinos all offer similar gaming offerings, and they also have their own casino membership, which Attempting to gamble underage is illegal under the Gambling Act 2005.Is it safe to play at UK online casinos?
If I can’t play seamlessly on my 3-year-old phone, that casino doesn’t make the cut. Let’s be real – a good bonus can be the difference between an average casino experience and an epic one. Pragmatic Play, Games Global (Microgaming), Hacksaw Gaming, Evolution, Push Gaming, and Elk Studios. We verify every license against the official UKGC database — you’d be shocked how many sites try to fake it. We deposit, we play, and we judge based on actual experience. Every UK casino site that makes it onto our list goes through a hands-on, real-money testing process.
2 Gambling Commission’s approach to the licensed sector
The industry’s case for cashless gambling on machines is based on changes in how society uses cash, and the safety implications for land-based venues. It also highlights that any move towards debit card payments directly on gaming machines would need to strike an appropriate balance between regulation applicable to modern payment methods, consumer benefits and protection of the licensing objectives. Electronic terminals do not count as gaming machines and like live multi-player tables do not have stake and prize limits, other than operators’ own house limits.
Gaming Machines – The GA 2005 defines gaming machines as a machine designed for use by individuals to gamble. Licensing credentials are strict regarding small versus large venue distinctions, how many gaming machines can be present and more. The effects of this helped keep casinos and other gambling operators in check with new technologies.
Customer interaction
How gambling operators use the data available to them was also covered by campaign and consumer groups, with some levelling specific criticisms regarding data governance and processing. This included data on operator interactions, showing that just over 3% of online gambling accounts spent over £2,000 in a year, but only 35.5% of these were subject to any safer gambling interaction (such as an email or pop up message), and just 0.84% received a safer gambling telephone call. Conversely, many outside the industry submitted evidence on the harms which individuals had suffered in spite of the existing controls, which they argued were therefore ineffective. Firstly, there was significant discussion of the existing controls and the majority (including industry stakeholders) presented evidence that current protections could and should be further improved. As well as specifying how certain account level protections should function, these include specific rules for online gambling product design, aimed at making sure games operate in a socially responsible manner and do not encourage potentially harmful gambling activity. These rules specify seven relevant categories of ‘indicators of harm’ which all operators must monitor from the moment an account is opened (Figure 4), and set out how operators must tailor the action they take based on these behavioural indicators.
In the current predominantly cash-based landscape, ATMs must be positioned to require a player to take a break in play in order to access additional funds. If No is selected What do you think the maximum committed payment limit should be for the following machine categories (£)? Shown if No is selected What do you think the maximum deposit limit should be for the following machine categories (£)? In order to bring direct cashless payment methods in line with the cash-based landscape, their maximum transaction value must be considered alongside the existing Gaming Machine (Circumstances of Use) Regulations 2007.

The UKGC is responsible for regulating arcades, betting, bingo, casinos, fruit machines, and lottery games as well as remote gambling, which including internet sites and telephone betting. A substantial number of responses drew upon the higher levels of customer spend which is evidenced on Category B gaming machines by comparison to Category C and D gaming machines, particularly as this relates to potential indicators of gambling-related harm. Equally, we want to ensure that customers receive a genuine offer of lower staking gaming machines as an important mitigation against gambling-related harm.

In at least some of these instances, customers in this country are incidental to the main purpose of the arrangement which is often to attract customers in overseas jurisdictions to the brand. In these instances, the target market is mainly customers in Great Britain, and the licensee is leveraging the third-party’s brand to expand its appeal. It is the licensee which contracts with any customers and is responsible for providing the ‘facilities to gamble’ as set out in the 2005 Act, in spite of any branding on the website.
Where these background checks fail to provide sufficient assurance that the account holder is of legal age, operators are required to have alternative age verification methods in place, which could involve requesting documentation. Some campaign groups called for even stronger online age verification measures, such as requiring ID document photos for all accounts or mandatory video calls on account creation. The largest football pools operator already prevents under 18s from creating an online account and supports increasing the minimum age to 18.
Visitors of SuperCasinoSites should keep in mind gambling can be highly addictive and as such, should always be approached responsibly and with due measure. According to UKGC research, roughly 22% of online gamblers who use credit cards can be classified as problem gamblers. They cannot promise guaranteed winnings or suggest that gambling can solve financial or personal problems. For example, gambling ads may not target children or young people under 18. It is a self-regulatory body, meaning its operations are funded not by the government but by a voluntary industry levy.
Therefore, when Parliamentary time allows, we plan to give the Gambling Commission increased powers to support disruption and enforcement activity, such as to pursue court orders which require internet service and payment providers to take down or block access to illegal gambling sites. It is also intended that more regulatory data, suitably anonymised, will be made available in due course to support independent research. We also welcome the commitment from governing bodies across the sport sector to develop a cross-sport gambling sponsorship code, with rules to make sure all sponsorship deals are socially responsible. This should reduce children’s incidental exposure to gambling logos while watching football and particularly via products such as stickers and video games, as well as the direct association with star players. Advertising rules have changed to prohibit prominent sportspeople, in particular Premier League footballers, from appearing in gambling adverts, on the grounds of their strong appeal to children.
We have reviewed and analysed the evidence received through both consultations to arrive at an evidence-based policy position which we believe meets our objectives. Evidence was received in response to the land-based gambling consultation and through an additional supplementary consultation which focused on this reform specifically. Operators will also need to be able to demonstrate that their new gambling and non-gambling areas abide by the updated rules in the Mandatory and Default Conditions, which will include the sliding scale and other restrictions on the sizes of different areas of the casino.

The Gambling Act 2005 paved the way for larger resort style casinos to be built, albeit in a controlled manner with one being built every few years until the Act is fully implemented. The Gaming Act 1968 (c. 65) liberalised the law, paving the way for more commercial casinos. James opened several casino-cum-cabaret and fine dining establishments in the 1960s, including the Charlie Chester Casino and Golden Horseshoe in London and the Kingsway and Grand Casino in Southport.
The high-end casinos are not distinct in legislation, and all have licences based on the 1968 Act; but their business model is very distinct in practice from that of most casinos in Great Britain and gaming machines contribute just 1% of their GGY compared with 20% to 30% in mainstream casinos. In support of its case for additional machines, the industry provided evidence that the current low availability of machines can in fact increase the risk of gambling-related harm, as customers play for longer on machines due to fear of losing their place. Gaming machines are permitted in a variety of locations, including casinos, licensed betting offices, licensed bingo premises, adult gaming centres and family entertainment centres and members clubs. Alcohol licensed premises, including pubs, are also able to offer two Category C and D gaming machines in reliance on their alcohol licence, or more if they apply to the licensing authority. Where casinos whose licence originates in the Gaming Act 1968 meet the requirements of a 2005 Act Small casino, including for size and non-gambling space, they will be eligible for the same gaming machine allowance and we will align fees and mandatory premises licence conditions as appropriate.
However, excessive commercial caution risks driving customers to the black market where they can be exposed to a variety of risks. It is apparent that some operators may be using restrictions to minimise commercial risk with excessive caution. However, some did acknowledge that operators cannot be expected to endlessly pay expert or even professional bettors as this would inevitably increase the costs for all customers, for instance through worse odds. Some specifically highlighted that restrictions could drive individuals to gamble with unlicensed operators or to illegally use third-party accounts (for example, in a family member’s name) to continue gambling in the licensed sector. The practice of not accepting bets from those who routinely ‘beat the book’ occurred long before the growth of online gambling, but has become far more sophisticated in the digital age.
The law places no restrictions on casino patrons; they are free to play casino games without a license and do not need to pay taxes on profits generated from gambling activities. Considered the most significant overhaul of the country’s gambling industry since the 1960s, the Act sets out three main objectives. The Betting and Gaming Act 1960 legalized private casinos for the first time, although it was very restrictive. The main regulatory authority is the Gambling Commission, which oversees all forms of gambling (except spread betting) on behalf of the government’s Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). In the 1960s the UK finally legalized casino operations, and today gaming establishments are open to anyone aged 18 or over. Although casinos were temporarily outlawed, they continued to flourish underground.